--- Comment #7 from ian at airs dot com 2006-08-18 15:58 ---
Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28765
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-08-18 15:44 ---
Fixed for 4.1.2.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 15:42 ---
Subject: Bug 28765
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Aug 18 15:42:27 2006
New Revision: 116241
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116241
Log:
2006-08-18 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 15:42 ---
Subject: Bug 28765
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Aug 18 15:42:05 2006
New Revision: 116240
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116240
Log:
2006-08-18 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-08-18 08:31 ---
Ok, I see... Then I will do the change, a little embarassing ;) By the way, if
it's not obvious, the reason we don't simply call _M_set_length is the other
base class, where clear cannot be trivial (due to refcounting) and
--- Comment #2 from ian at airs dot com 2006-08-18 06:32 ---
Unfortunately I do not currently have a valid copyright assignment with the
FSF. I think my one word change is fine, but I don't feel comfortable moving a
function around (although I agree that is the right approach).
--
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-08-18 02:13 ---
Hi Ian. Please go ahead with the inlining: only, from a stylistical point of
view, please move the entire body inline, do not mark inline the out of line
code. Patch preapproved, thanks a lot!
--
pcarlini at suse dot de
