--- Comment #12 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-01-20 02:34 ---
Fixed for 4.1.0.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-20 02:33 ---
Subject: Bug 25823
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jan 20 02:33:21 2006
New Revision: 110010
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110010
Log:
2006-01-20 Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstdc
--- Comment #10 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-01-18 12:39 ---
Target is 4.1.1, not suited for 4_0-branch, because of libstdc++/25472.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 11:22 ---
Subject: Bug 25823
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 18 11:22:10 2006
New Revision: 109883
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109883
Log:
2006-01-18 Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstdc+
--- Comment #8 from pedz at easesoftware dot net 2006-01-17 22:02 ---
Note that 25824 is a close cousin to this bug report.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25823
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-17 20:53 ---
Confirmed, this looks obviously broken.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-01-17 19:08 ---
If it's not abvious already to everyone, the reason the issue didn't show up
before on linux is that, when _GLIBCXX_HOSTED is not defined we are *not*
including an no declaration conflicts with the wrong one.
--
http:
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-01-17 18:50 ---
I have just completed succesfully a build on linux with both patches applied.
Look fine to me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25823
--- Comment #4 from pedz at easesoftware dot net 2006-01-17 18:40 ---
I have not tried it and do not have the equipment to try it except on a Mac. I
can do that if it would help.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25823
--- Comment #3 from chris at bubblescope dot net 2006-01-17 18:09 ---
Does that patch break other systems? (linux-x86 would seem the obvious thing to
try..)
--
chris at bubblescope dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from pedz at easesoftware dot net 2006-01-17 17:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=10659)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10659&action=view)
My Patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25823
--- Comment #1 from pedz at easesoftware dot net 2006-01-17 17:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=10658)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10658&action=view)
How configure was called
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25823
12 matches
Mail list logo
