[Bug libstdc++/24595] std::tr1::get_deleter not declared

2005-11-12 Thread gcc-bugzilla at kayari dot org
--- Comment #6 from gcc-bugzilla at kayari dot org 2005-11-12 14:12 --- Created an attachment (id=10227) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10227&action=view) alternative fix This is a fixed version of the previous patch that passes tests on linux-x86_64. This patch ma

[Bug libstdc++/24595] std::tr1::get_deleter not declared

2005-11-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 21:42 --- I'm building the compiler now, will test a.s.a.p -- redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libstdc++/24595] std::tr1::get_deleter not declared

2005-11-09 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-11-10 01:12 --- (In reply to comment #3) > We could leave _M_get_deleter private... This would be nice, of course. Can you test the patch? Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24595

[Bug libstdc++/24595] std::tr1::get_deleter not declared

2005-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 19:49 --- Created an attachment (id=10194) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10194&action=view) alternative fix This bug was my fault - sorry for the dumb mistake, and not catching it. We could leave _M_get_de

[Bug libstdc++/24595] std::tr1::get_deleter not declared

2005-11-01 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-11-01 11:14 --- Fixed for 4.0.3. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/24595] std::tr1::get_deleter not declared

2005-10-31 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-10-31 12:06 --- Humpf, we are missing some free functions! Thanks. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added