[Bug libstdc++/21674] basic_string vs debug_mode

2008-12-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #10 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-12-14 00:43 --- Should really be XFAIL'ing this test on targets that don't use glibc? We have been seeing... XPASS: 21_strings/basic_string/element_access/char/21674.cc execution test XPASS: 21_strings/basic_string/eleme

[Bug libstdc++/21674] basic_string vs debug_mode

2005-09-22 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-22 08:58 --- This is WONTFIX for 4.0.x, but is fixed in 4.1.x and later. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/21674] basic_string vs debug_mode

2005-09-22 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-22 08:49 --- Sure! And thanks a lot for your concise and very effective fix! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21674

[Bug libstdc++/21674] basic_string vs debug_mode

2005-09-22 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-22 08:27 --- Hey Paolo. I consider this fixed for mainline. I don't want to port this to gcc-4_0-branch. First of all, this isn't a regression since debug mode was introduced in 3.4 and refined in 4.0.x, but is essentiall

[Bug libstdc++/21674] basic_string vs debug_mode

2005-09-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15 18:59 --- Subject: Bug 21674 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 18:58:04 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog libstdc++-v3/inclu

[Bug libstdc++/21674] basic_string vs debug_mode

2005-09-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-14 03:22 --- Subject: Bug 21674 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-14 03:22:17 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog Added files: libst

[Bug libstdc++/21674] basic_string vs debug_mode

2005-09-13 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/21674] basic_string vs debug_mode

2005-05-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-27 19:20 --- Subject: Bug 21674 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-27 19:19:47 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog Log message: 2005

[Bug libstdc++/21674] basic_string vs debug_mode

2005-05-24 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-24 08:38 --- Indeed, Benjamin, I also get this, and that't why probably the issue is not serious as I was afraid it was. However, we are basically relying on inlining to happen for this to work, and that's brittle (as Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/21674] basic_string vs debug_mode

2005-05-23 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24 04:22 --- Dudes, just a quick pass at this. a.out: /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.3/../../../../include/c++/3.4.3/bits/basic_string.h:643: typename _Alloc::reference std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>::oper

[Bug libstdc++/21674] basic_string vs debug_mode

2005-05-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21 14:13 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E