--- Comment #18 from cristipp at excite dot com 2006-03-22 19:10 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> see the solution in 24660
I'm not sure I understand correctly: are all C++ template libraries supposed to
add 24660-style machinery?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21405
--- Comment #17 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-22 04:51 ---
see the solution in 24660
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21405
--- Comment #16 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-03-20 19:35 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> see PR19664, PR20218, PR20297.
ops, this is the note for C#10.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21405
--- Comment #15 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-03-20 19:34 ---
see PR19664, PR20218, PR20297.
--
pluto at agmk dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #14 from cristipp at excite dot com 2006-03-20 18:32 ---
The problem is not how the dynamic linker treats 'weak' symbols. The problem is
that template originating functions having no version numbers. It just happen
that template originating functions are also marked as weak (
--- Comment #13 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-20 17:30 ---
FWIW, the current GNU binutils and glibc treat the weak definition in
shared libraries as strong. There is even a whole set of testsuite for
this in the GNU binutils.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21405
--- Comment #12 from cristipp at excite dot com 2006-03-20 17:07 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> There is an one defintion rule in C++ unlike most other languages which have
> weak symbols. And if you are working around it by using hidden symbols well
> you are asking to run into troubl
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 18:20
---
There is an one defintion rule in C++ unlike most other languages which have
weak symbols. And if you are working around it by using hidden symbols well
you are asking to run into troubles.
--
http://gcc.gnu.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||matze at braunis dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21405
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||adam at gimp dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21405
--- Additional Comments From mike at navi dot cx 2005-06-01 11:56 ---
So this feature is basically terminally broken and never worked in the first
place?
How about if GCC supported a new attribute or something that made it emit
inlines for that class with a specific symbol version?
--
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-31
15:10 ---
You can't use -fvisibility-inlines-hidden or otherwise you'll get linker errors
if the compiler later decides not to inline those functions. I don't think you
can win.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho
--- Additional Comments From mike at navi dot cx 2005-05-31 13:23 ---
Reopening the bug, as Benjamin wishes to track it.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-25 22:49
---
Changing this to libstdc++, so we remember to track this.
--
What|Removed |Added
Compo
14 matches
Mail list logo
