[Bug libstdc++/18174] documentation example for std::priority_queue usage

2005-11-06 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-11-06 13:10 --- Fixed for 4.0.3. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/18174] documentation example for std::priority_queue usage

2005-11-06 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 13:09 --- Subject: Bug 18174 Author: paolo Date: Sun Nov 6 13:09:50 2005 New Revision: 106561 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106561 Log: 2005-11-06 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR libstd

[Bug libstdc++/18174] documentation example for std::priority_queue usage

2005-11-06 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 13:07 --- Subject: Bug 18174 Author: paolo Date: Sun Nov 6 13:07:11 2005 New Revision: 106560 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106560 Log: 2005-11-06 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR libstd

[Bug libstdc++/18174] documentation example for std::priority_queue usage

2005-07-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-02 01:34 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug libstdc++/18174] documentation example for std::priority_queue usage

2004-10-27 Thread Number_42 at caramail dot com
--- Additional Comments From Number_42 at caramail dot com 2004-10-27 12:00 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Could you send your patch to gcc-patches@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also could you make it off the HEAD (aka > 4.0.0)? I can send it to these mailing lists but i can't download the

[Bug libstdc++/18174] documentation example for std::priority_queue usage

2004-10-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 11:45 --- Could you send your patch to gcc-patches@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also could you make it off the HEAD (aka 4.0.0)? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18174