--- Comment #12 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-08-06 14:47 ---
Now I get:
<_Z1fRKSt6vectorIbSaIbEEj>:
0: 55 push %ebp
1: 89 e5 mov%esp,%ebp
3: 8b 45 08mov0x8(%ebp),%eax
6: 8b 4d 0c
--- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 14:45 ---
Subject: Bug 16611
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Aug 6 14:45:04 2006
New Revision: 115972
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115972
Log:
2006-08-06 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libst
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse dot de
|dot org |
--- Comment #10 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-23 21:13 ---
Well, I'm not sure that, besides code size, 4_1 is doing better than 4.0.2, but
both are certainly better than 3.4.x.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16611
--- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-23 20:12 ---
FWIW, on x86-linux at least, we are making progress on the compiler side.
With 4.0.2 I get (-O2):
<_Z1fRKSt6vectorIbSaIbEEj>:
0: 55 push %ebp
1: 89 e5 mov%es
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-18 14:23
---
> This is news to me. Does this mean that vector is not going to be
> special-
> cased any more? That seems like a very bad idea to me, since programs will
> suddenly take 8 times as much memory (or even more). Wh
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-04-18 08:10
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Hi. It can well be a libstdc++ problem, and indeed I can imagine ways to avoid
> signed integers in the code. However, I'm not sure that someone will actually
> do the work, given the soon
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-17 16:34
---
Hi. It can well be a libstdc++ problem, and indeed I can imagine ways to avoid
signed integers in the code. However, I'm not sure that someone will actually
do the work, given the soon-to-be-deprecated status of ve
--- Additional Comments From sabre at nondot dot org 2005-04-12 14:31
---
This is definately a libstdc++ issue.
-Chris
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16611
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-04-12 08:07
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> This code from stl_bvector.h is the problem: [...]
Hmm, right. I don't fully understand why it is done in this complicated
manner, does vector::operator[] need to do anything more than my
10 matches
Mail list logo
