https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118855
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118855
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8ad697a75b0870a833366daf687668a57cabb6e
commit r15-7648-ge8ad697a75b0870a833366daf687668a57cabb6e
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118855
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> I'll test this properly tomorrow, but it passes the 26_numerics/bit/* tests:
That is exactly what I meant.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118855
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #0)
> That is not the problem in C++ with templates. The advantage of
> __builtin_*g is that it will be shorter to parse, fewer ops in constexpr
> evaluation.
And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118855
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'll test this properly tomorrow, but it passes the 26_numerics/bit/* tests:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/bit
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/bit
@@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118855
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
