https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117889
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117889
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29bea6921d0e2e3dd20bc78926ef0e98b1b1e4ad
commit r15-5889-g29bea6921d0e2e3dd20bc78926ef0e98b1b1e4ad
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117889
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And the unconstrained Focus(T) constructor is still a terrible idea.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117889
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117889
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-12-03
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117889
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Semi reduced:
```
#include
struct LayoutUnit {
constexpr LayoutUnit();
template
constexpr explicit LayoutUnit(IntegerType value);
constexpr explicit LayoutUnit(unsigned long value);
constexpr ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117889
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Trying to reduce it but not convinced it'll turn out useful.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117889
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
https://dev.gentoo.org/~sam/bugs/gcc/117889/core_jumbo_174_gcc14.ii.xz
https://dev.gentoo.org/~sam/bugs/gcc/117889/core_jumbo_174_gcc15.ii.xz
