https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31c3b67dfc6e67773d13260bc38b833663698b74
commit r14-2753-g31c3b67dfc6e67773d13260bc38b833663698b74
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #20)
> The stoll and stoull tests pass when dg-require-string-conversions is 1.
> The stold test
> fails, I think because it returns LDBL_MAX instead of HUGE_VALL (i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #20 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-07-19 6:10 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
>
> --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #18)
> The stof.cc and stold.cc tests fail in try-catch.
Yes, my suggested patch in comment 12 was wrong, because it only set errno on
error and didn't throw an exce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #18 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-07-19 6:10 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
>
> --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> This should be fixed now, and you s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16)
> PASS: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stoll.cc (test for
> excess errors)
> PASS: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stoll.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This should be fixed now, and you should see these in libstdc++.sum
PASS: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stod.cc (test for excess
errors)
PASS: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f07136af570b145fe0df6b142defc9558998bf53
commit r14-2637-gf07136af570b145fe0df6b142defc9558998bf53
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0b0c21152b337bc9a8ef3a72a15c8dcdff1d847
commit r14-2636-gf0b0c21152b337bc9a8ef3a72a15c8dcdff1d847
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58303d42809f0e01f23262f592d37943f7703f71
commit r14-2635-g58303d42809f0e01f23262f592d37943f7703f71
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #11)
> Yes, this works.
Great, thanks.
> hppa64-hpux does not have have strtof. Could std::stof be implemented using
> strtod in this case?
Maybe something like t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-07-14 5:58 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
>
> --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> And this should fix it:
>
> --- a/l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And this should fix it:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cstdlib
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cstdlib
@@ -256,6 +256,20 @@ namespace std
using ::__gnu_cxx::strtold;
} // namespace std
+#el
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #8)
> or maybe "using::strtold" additions are needed to various cstdlib files in
> gcc.
Yes, that's the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-07-13 2:16 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
>
> --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
> On 2023-07-13 1:57 p.m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-07-13 1:57 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> ./hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h:4161:36: error:
> 'strtold' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-07-13 1:09 p.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I'm testing this, which should define std::stof and std::stold for hpux11.11:
>
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h
> +++ b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #3)
> On 2023-07-13 9:46 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > Dave, does this patch work for hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 ?
> Yes.
Great - pushed to trunk.
> On hpux, dou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1d12752f8d45df5d7962cef6e2a87585002e982
commit r14-2504-ga1d12752f8d45df5d7962cef6e2a87585002e982
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-07-13 9:46 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Created attachment 55534
>--> htt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 55534
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55534&action=edit
libstdc++: std::stoi etc. do not need C99 support
Dave, does this patch work for hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 ?
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
23 matches
Mail list logo
