[Bug libstdc++/106780] gcc maybe-uninitialized warning on std_function.h

2022-10-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106780 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/106780] gcc maybe-uninitialized warning on std_function.h

2022-08-31 Thread vincent.lextrait at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106780 --- Comment #3 from Vincent --- Yes it seems safe to consider it a dupe.

[Bug libstdc++/106780] gcc maybe-uninitialized warning on std_function.h

2022-08-31 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106780 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Dup of PR 105562?

[Bug libstdc++/106780] gcc maybe-uninitialized warning on std_function.h

2022-08-31 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106780 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-08-31 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/106780] gcc maybe-uninitialized warning on std_function.h

2022-08-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106780 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- > cat t.C #include > /space/rguenther/install/gcc-12.1/bin/g++ -S t.C -Wall -Wextra > -pedantic-errors I can't reproduce. So can you provide a testcase?