[Bug libstdc++/105281] status of constexpr and for c++23

2023-05-22 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105281 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g.peterh...@t-online.de --- Comment #

[Bug libstdc++/105281] status of constexpr and for c++23

2022-11-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105281 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Thanks for the survey! (In reply to Jiang An from comment #2) > constexpr in C++23, lack constexpr (for some overloads) in libstdc++: > abs > modf > remquo > frexp Also imaxabs and imaxdiv, assuming http

[Bug libstdc++/105281] status of constexpr and for c++23

2022-04-19 Thread de34 at live dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105281 Jiang An changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de34 at live dot cn --- Comment #2 from Jian

[Bug libstdc++/105281] status of constexpr and for c++23

2022-04-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105281 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Those changes in have been present since GCC 4.6, so they predate the C++23 changes by *many* years. Nobody has yet verified how closely it conforms to the new C++23 spec.