https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105128
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105128
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16946c7c823c2d6531ac272d31d68d95d9c30ddd
commit r11-10116-g16946c7c823c2d6531ac272d31d68d95d9c30ddd
Author: Jakub Jeline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105128
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105128
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a82301d409d3aa0e0b3b884e4c6daeaa0486d6b
commit r12-7968-g2a82301d409d3aa0e0b3b884e4c6daeaa0486d6b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105128
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Created attachment 52738 [details]
> gcc12-pr105128.patch
>
> So like this untested patch?
> Can test it with gcc, but don't have a new enough clang around.
yes, it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105128
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105128
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 52736
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52736&action=edit
Modified source_location header that works on both gcc and clang
It looks like clang requires __impl to be defined
