https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103805
--- Comment #6 from Martin Reinecke ---
Ouch. That reminds me when Redhat(?) did the same many years ago and caused no
end of confusion. Anyway, sorry for the noise!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103805
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103805
--- Comment #4 from Martin Reinecke ---
Sorry if I specified the wrong version. My local (Debian unstable) g++ reports
martin@marvin:~/codes/ducc$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103805
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.2.0 |11.2.1
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103805
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103805
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
