[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 Thomas Rodgers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Thomas Rodgers : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:977cbabeb1c1a9a28cc45655bdc693e1594642f0 commit r11-9931-g977cbabeb1c1a9a28cc45655bdc693e1594642f0 Author: Thomas W Rodg

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Rodgers : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c21556daf385fe9ece37319f574776dd7d8ab1c commit r12-8231-g7c21556daf385fe9ece37319f574776dd7d8ab1c Author: Thomas W Rodgers Date

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.3|11.4 --- Comment #15 from Richard Bien

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Rodgers --- Created attachment 52420 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52420&action=edit Make notify_one/notify_all non-const I submitted this patch to the list.

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 Óscar Fuentes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 Thomas Rodgers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|SUSPENDED --- Comment #11 from Thomas

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- N.B. [member.functions] in the standard says "For a non-virtual member function described in the C++ standard library, an implementation may declare a different set of member function signatures, provid

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Óscar Fuentes from comment #6) > So IIUC you are applying modifications to libstdc++ that deviate from the > published standard expecting that the committee will accept those changes. > As a u

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 103933 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Rodgers --- (In reply to Óscar Fuentes from comment #6) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > > (In reply to Óscar Fuentes from comment #4) > > > The fix is wrong. It changes atomic_notify_one and atomic_no

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 --- Comment #6 from Óscar Fuentes --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > (In reply to Óscar Fuentes from comment #4) > > The fix is wrong. It changes atomic_notify_one and atomic_notify_all instead > > of atomic<>::wait. > > It cha

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Óscar Fuentes from comment #4) > The fix is wrong. It changes atomic_notify_one and atomic_notify_all instead > of atomic<>::wait. It changed both. > So right now atomic<>::wait remains unfi

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 Óscar Fuentes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Thomas Rodgers : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aca7d4e8790bff32ee749936bb0224d873c46052 commit r11-9371-gaca7d4e8790bff32ee749936bb0224d873c46052 Author: Thomas Rodgers

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Rodgers : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38c60e5075f89265a560eab166d43247624a7535 commit r12-5886-g38c60e5075f89265a560eab166d43247624a7535 Author: Thomas Rodgers Date:

[Bug libstdc++/102994] std::atomic::wait is not marked const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102994 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org