https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e2b297b0bb77317e759a180a5d4b701f6e5e6e4
commit r13-9185-g3e2b297b0bb77317e759a180a5d4b701f6e5e6e4
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c608b57f77a47179899666940c3b8b6a2e5435b2
commit r14-9550-gc608b57f77a47179899666940c3b8b6a2e5435b2
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Maybe we could do something like this:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/pstl/parallel_backend_tbb.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/pstl/parallel_backend_tbb.h
@@ -15,6 +15,11 @@
#include "parallel_backend_utils.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11)
> Yes, it was fixed by r11-4187 but the problem is still present on the gcc-10
> branch.
I think that commit simply makes it possible to use oneTBB, which d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. you can use -DTBB_SUPPRESS_DEPRECATED_MESSAGES=1 to suppress the warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
kerukuro changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kerukuro at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
hicham at mouline dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hicham at mouline dot org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.1.0
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
--- Comment #10 from Pilar Latiesa ---
I believe this was fixed for 11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
Thomas Rodgers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rodgertq at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|MOVED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
Pilar Latiesa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There's no easy solution. Intel contributed the PSTL headers with a dependency
on TBB task.h header, then deprecated that header in a later TBB release. You
need to either use an older TBB, or suppress the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
--- Comment #3 from Kip Warner ---
Thanks Andrew. I've opened an issue downstream:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1933775
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|#include |tbb/task.h is Deprecated in
|tri
18 matches
Mail list logo
