https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100133
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100133
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100133
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
After actually executing the same code on my local and remote servers, I did
not produce such a result. In both cases, std::copy achieved the expected
high-efficiency performance, so I think this should only be Quick
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100133
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
And the libstdc++‘s std::copy is also 8.9 times slower than the equivalent
std::tranfrom:
#include
#include
#include
const std::vector v(100, 42);
static void copy_from_vector(benchmark::State& state)
{
for (a
