https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df41dbfd22528b1241668af21a979204b876fb67
commit r11-11500-gdf41dbfd22528b1241668af21a979204b876fb67
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Should be fixed for 12.4+ too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9987fe67cf6211515d8ebf6528cc83c77dfb5bf3
commit r12-10517-g9987fe67cf6211515d8ebf6528cc83c77dfb5bf3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 13.3 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc39bd532d4de1ba0b2785246fb6fdd63ec2e92c
commit r13-8625-gcc39bd532d4de1ba0b2785246fb6fdd63ec2e92c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8455d6f6cd43b7b143ab9ee19437452fceba9cc9
commit r14-9769-g8455d6f6cd43b7b143ab9ee19437452fceba9cc9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #11 from Matthias Klose ---
while not a test case, that was seen when running autopkg tests of the evolver
package against glibc 2.39 packages.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/2052929
the failing evolver test i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess we should go with the above patch after fixing formatting, but it isn't
enough,
printf_fphex.c has similar code.
Even in glibc which doesn't support printing _Float128 nor any other type which
would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #7 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Note also that in glibc, _Float128 support in printf code can only be used in
limited circumstances: either on powerpc64le, as one of the multiple supported
long double formats there, or through the sharin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer ---
This looks like a glibc bug to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
Is the stack properly aligned at this point?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>From what I can see, glibc uses there the same thing as libquadmath does, so
why is it ok on the glibc side and not on the libquadmath side?
I mean
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=stdio-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
CC|
18 matches
Mail list logo
