http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31845
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--- Comment #8 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-06-29 05:37 ---
Note: Ignore those two attachments they are for a different bug report. For
some reason when I made an attachment to a different bug report bugzilla put
them here.
Janis:
Someone else reported the same problem in another
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-06-29 05:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=15825)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15825&action=view)
./libtool --tag=GCJ --config > tag_GCJ.txt
Attached two outputs from libtool.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-06-29 05:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=15824)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15824&action=view)
./libtool --tag=CXX --config > tag_CXX.txt
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31845
--- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-24 17:23 ---
Rob, thanks for investigating this and finding new values. No one seems to
have paid any attention here, so please send this as a patch to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (let me know privately if you have questions about
that) and
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-06-24 12:30 ---
After a bit of testing I came up with these final values:
gcc-4_3-trunk/libmudflap/testsuite/lib/mfdg.exp
/root/downloads/gcc-4_3-trunk/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.cth/pass39-frag.c
/* { dg-timeout 10 } */
/* { dg-time
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-06-12 11:16 ---
FIX - Altered "dg-timeout":
/root/downloads/gcc-4_3-trunk/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.cth/pass37-frag-Origonal.c
/* { dg-output "100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100" } */
/* { dg-repetitions 20 } */
/* { dg-timeou
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-06-09 03:45 ---
Tried running "make -i check" on a just-built version of gcc while compiling a
newer revision of gcc in a different X-Window. The load was enough to give a
number of timeouts in various places.
It is inconvenient to be una
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-05-24 06:15 ---
This has not happened in the last few weeks.
It _might_ be fixed. I would need to wait until I'm doing a half a dozen things
at once and had a high load; while compiling gcc.
If a maintainer happens across this bug report
