http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
--- Comment #6 from Dave Boutcher 2012-05-16
01:43:51 UTC ---
Thanks for the testcase Patrick. Let me dig into the pr51516.C failure before
I resubmit the patch with the testcase.
Torvald, as Patrick said, this seems to be purely a gcc issue...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Marlier
2012-05-15 22:23:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 27412
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27412
testcase for gcc testsuite
The problem is not into libitm.
Attached a testcase for testsuite (gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
--- Comment #3 from Dave Boutcher 2012-05-08
22:56:23 UTC ---
I just submitted a patch for this one (Issue 6201064)
(http://codereview.appspot.com/6201064/)
Patch included here just for fun:
Index: gcc/trans-mem.c
diff --git a/gcc/trans-mem.c b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
Patrick Marlier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.marlier at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
--- Comment #1 from Dave Boutcher 2012-04-18
17:46:17 UTC ---
The problem seems to be that functions referenced only by function pointers are
not put in the tmclone table. I can work around the problem by making a bogus
call to the function anyw
