[Bug libgomp/34519] pr26943-2.c is regressed on mainline

2007-12-18 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #5 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-18 23:11 --- Re-tested with no problems now, but machine was under %300 load when this test failed. Interestingly rest of the regtests passed fine. Anyway this is invalid. Thanks for the attention. -- ismail at pardus dot o

[Bug libgomp/34519] pr26943-2.c is regressed on mainline

2007-12-18 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #4 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-18 14:39 --- [~]> gcc -fopenmp -march=i486 pr26943-2.c -lgomp [~]> ./a.out [~]> works fine like this, I don't know why it fails in the tests. Hmm wonder if --with-cpu=generic could affect this? This is a 4 CPU Xeon machine b

[Bug libgomp/34519] pr26943-2.c is regressed on mainline

2007-12-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-18 14:30 --- On i386 you need also -march=i486 or higher, i386 doesn't have instructions for atomic stuff. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34519

[Bug libgomp/34519] pr26943-2.c is regressed on mainline

2007-12-18 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #2 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-18 14:17 --- I was testing outside of the testsuite to see why it failed. I see this in log : PASS: libgomp.c/pr26943-2.c (test for excess errors) Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to .:/var/pisi/gcc-4.3_pre20071218-31/work/gcc-4.3-2007

[Bug libgomp/34519] pr26943-2.c is regressed on mainline

2007-12-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-18 10:52 --- This test relies on being compiled wit -fopenmp (as a bunch of other tests do). Why are you compiling it without it? -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added