[Bug libgomp/29987] libgomp.c++/ctor-9.C failure

2008-11-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-14 19:08 --- *** Bug 38118 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libgomp/29987] libgomp.c++/ctor-9.C failure

2007-01-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 13:47 --- As a workaround, gcc could check for this in configure and if it detects the bug, override TARGET_ASM_SELECT_SECTION such that on Solaris with this bug detected it would: section * solaris_elf_select_section (tree decl

[Bug libgomp/29987] libgomp.c++/ctor-9.C failure

2006-12-28 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 04:45 --- I think the first step is to report it to sun so they track it and hopefully one day fix their toolchain. Does anyone have a support contract who can file a report? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug libgomp/29987] libgomp.c++/ctor-9.C failure

2006-11-26 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 14:38 --- > Is this a known bug or do we need to report it to Sun? Since the Sun toolchain doesn't use the assembler by default, it is very likely unknown to them. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987

[Bug libgomp/29987] libgomp.c++/ctor-9.C failure

2006-11-26 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 14:03 --- Is this a known bug or do we need to report it to Sun? If known, is there a patch we can recommend in the Solaris-specific installation docs? -- ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed