[Bug libgcj/9250] runtime should only use non-visible locks

2006-03-29 Thread mark at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-29 18:14 --- TYhis bug is now closed but I wanted to add the following link for the archives. A couple of these denial of service attacks by taking locks were in the examples of Sascha's GNU Classpath Security talk at Fosdem 2004: h

[Bug libgcj/9250] runtime should only use non-visible locks

2006-03-29 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-29 17:52 --- I now agree with comment #4. I don't think this is a bug. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug libgcj/9250] runtime should only use non-visible locks

2005-11-17 Thread mckinlay at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 from mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-11-17 17:38 --- I'm curious whether other Java implementations do this - my guess is no, since some of these locks are mandated by the spec (during class initialization, for example), so it seems that denial-of-service attacks would alw