--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-05 09:42 ---
.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-27 14:45 ---
*** Bug 37051 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-23 13:52 ---
Subject: Bug 8995
Author: aph
Date: Tue Sep 23 13:51:58 2008
New Revision: 140593
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140593
Log:
2008-09-17 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libgcj/8995:
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-22 16:58 ---
Subject: Bug 8995
Author: aph
Date: Fri Aug 22 16:57:11 2008
New Revision: 139494
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139494
Log:
2008-08-22 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libgcj/8995:
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-22 16:20 ---
Subject: Bug 8995
Author: aph
Date: Fri Aug 22 16:04:29 2008
New Revision: 139492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139492
Log:
2008-08-22 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libgcj/8895:
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-22 16:18 ---
Subject: Bug 8995
Author: aph
Date: Fri Aug 22 16:17:19 2008
New Revision: 139493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139493
Log:
Fix PR#.
2008-08-22 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR li
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 17:17 ---
Despite what the original report says, we don't really want to
resolve all entries when compiling.
Also it would be best to avoid any kind of synchronization at all.
One idea would be to 'or' the argument to one of t
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
23:17 ---
FWIW that patch has long since gone missing :-(
Perhaps this problem can most easily be solved using the
new __sync built-ins.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8995
