[Bug libgcj/30632] libgcj failed to build for Linux/ia64

2007-07-13 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 13:26 --- Seems to work now. -- hjl at lucon dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcj/30632] libgcj failed to build for Linux/ia64

2007-01-30 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 19:47 --- Yes, as far as we know libjava is parallel build safe. Could you paste the command line for the failing compilation? And also run it with -E and see what jvmti*.h files are actually being used? Perhaps we have a wrong

[Bug libgcj/30632] libgcj failed to build for Linux/ia64

2007-01-29 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-29 21:00 --- I do have an older gcc 4.3 installed and I am doing "make -j8" on an ia64 machine with 16 pocessors. Is libjava parallel build safe? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30632

[Bug libgcj/30632] libgcj failed to build for Linux/ia64

2007-01-29 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-29 20:16 --- This is very weird. I don't see how it can happen... The definition is: static jvmtiError JNICALL _Jv_JVMTI_SuspendThread (MAYBE_UNUSED jvmtiEnv *env, jthread thread) and afaics jthread is defined in include/jvmti

[Bug libgcj/30632] libgcj failed to build for Linux/ia64

2007-01-29 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-29 20:08 --- Oops. I meant to say this patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2007-q1/msg00237.html might be the cause. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30632