--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-11 18:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=12892)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12892&action=view)
An updated patch
"cp -L" may not be portable. This updated patch tries "cp -LpR" before "cp
-pR".
--
hjl at lucon dot
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 23:55 ---
Hmm... you make a symlink tree instead of just running
configure from the readonly tree?
I thought we supported readonly trees.
Anyway, is cp -L portable?
that's the only question.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot or
--- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-10 13:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=12880)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12880&action=view)
A patch
This is a patch I am using. My gcc checkout tree is readonly. I use symlink to
create a writable tree. "cp -pR" d
--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-10 05:12 ---
One of failed commands is
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/gcj
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libjava/
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/ -ffloat-store
-fomit-f
--- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-10 02:22 ---
I configured gcc with
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld
\
\
--enable-shared \
--enable-threads=posix \
--enable-hai
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 01:43 ---
How did you configure?
Did you use 'make -j'?
Is there anything else we should know?
There's not enough info in this report to do anything useful, I'm afraid.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30419
