[Bug libgcj/28977] UTF-16 endianness differs between gcj and Sun JDK

2016-10-03 Thread gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28977 Andrew John Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org -

[Bug libgcj/28977] UTF-16 endianness differs between gcj and Sun JDK

2016-09-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28977 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcj/28977] UTF-16 endianness differs between gcj and Sun JDK

2008-02-03 Thread marcus at better dot se
--- Comment #4 from marcus at better dot se 2008-02-03 20:43 --- The bug is still in gcj 4.3. The Sun API docs are quite clear about how this should behave: "When decoding, the UTF-16 charset interprets a byte-order mark to indicate the byte order of the stream but defaults to big-endia

[Bug libgcj/28977] UTF-16 endianness differs between gcj and Sun JDK

2006-09-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 18:40 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, I have a library for XML processing that comes with a test suite, and it > expects the Sun behaviour. Besides it's documented in Sun's API, so it can > potentially matter. Really if

[Bug libgcj/28977] UTF-16 endianness differs between gcj and Sun JDK

2006-09-07 Thread marcus at better dot se
--- Comment #2 from marcus at better dot se 2006-09-07 18:37 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Does this really matter as UTF-16 BOM is correct? Well, I have a library for XML processing that comes with a test suite, and it expects the Sun behaviour. Besides it's documented in Sun's API, s

[Bug libgcj/28977] UTF-16 endianness differs between gcj and Sun JDK

2006-09-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 18:28 --- Does this really matter as UTF-16 BOM is correct? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28977