--- Comment #9 from mckinlay at redhat dot com 2006-04-20 23:55 ---
I have checked in the fix to the trunk and gcc-4_1-branch.
--
mckinlay at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #8 from bryce at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 23:52 ---
Subject: Bug 27170
Author: bryce
Date: Thu Apr 20 23:52:14 2006
New Revision: 113124
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113124
Log:
PR libgcj/27170
* gnu/gcj/runtime/natSharedLibLoa
--- Comment #7 from bryce at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 23:48 ---
Subject: Bug 27170
Author: bryce
Date: Thu Apr 20 23:47:56 2006
New Revision: 113123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113123
Log:
PR libgcj/27170
* gnu/gcj/runtime/natSharedLibLoa
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 16:00 ---
We could either use here (see ltdl.c) or we could
use libltdl instead of directly using dlopen...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27170
--- Comment #5 from green at redhat dot com 2006-04-17 14:44 ---
I've uploaded a patch that I've applied to the FC5 gcc RPM. I can't reproduce
the problem with this patch.
--
green at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from green at redhat dot com 2006-04-17 14:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=11283)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11283&action=view)
Sample patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27170
--- Comment #3 from green at redhat dot com 2006-04-14 21:01 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Based on the thread 13 stack trace, it looks to me like we're calling dlopen
> directly, when we should somehow be arranging to call GC_dlopen. GC_dlopen is
> included in the GC to avoid this sor
--- Comment #2 from Hans dot Boehm at hp dot com 2006-04-14 20:51 ---
Based on the thread 13 stack trace, it looks to me like we're calling dlopen
directly, when we should somehow be arranging to call GC_dlopen. GC_dlopen is
included in the GC to avoid this sort of deadlock.
(The way G
--- Comment #1 from green at redhat dot com 2006-04-14 18:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=11273)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11273&action=view)
stack traces from gdb.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27170
