--- Comment #10 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 19:54 ---
Forgot to mark as fixed.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 19:53 ---
Fix checked in.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26177
--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 19:52 ---
Subject: Bug 26177
Author: tromey
Date: Fri Feb 10 19:52:44 2006
New Revision: 110847
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110847
Log:
Re-merged all regular expression code.
For PR l
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 18:54 ---
The regex changes are unlikely to cause big destabilization for 3 reasons:
* They are pure java
* The regex code has historically been somewhat broken, so we're unlikely
to make the situation worse
* They've been t
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 17:52 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Subject: Re: [4.1 only] Exception when compiling valid regex pattern
>
> No, this is no regression. Java is not release critical to GCC so we
> should just fix this bug as we fix many oth
--- Comment #5 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-02-08 17:49 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 only] Exception when compiling valid regex pattern
No, this is no regression. Java is not release critical to GCC so we
should just fix this bug as we fix many other bugs too. Not just
regressions.
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 17:34 ---
Is this a regression? libgcj should take care that GCC is in super release
mode now.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
