[Bug libgcj/24051] [4.1 Regression] libjava failed to configure

2005-09-30 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 20:49 --- Fix checked in. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOL

[Bug libgcj/24051] [4.1 Regression] libjava failed to configure

2005-09-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 20:47 --- Subject: Bug 24051 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-30 20:46:59 Modified files: libjava: ChangeLog Makefile.am Makefile.in con

[Bug libgcj/24051] [4.1 Regression] libjava failed to configure

2005-09-30 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Summary|[4.1 Regres

[Bug libgcj/24051] [4.1 Regression]: libjava failed to configure

2005-09-28 Thread uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28 22:09 --- Same problem on s390(x)-ibm-linux. B.t.w. isn't the real problem that the CXX that comes out of the configure machinery is simply incorrect? I.e. it should be something like "xgcc -x c++" instead of just

[Bug libgcj/24051] [4.1 Regression]: libjava failed to configure

2005-09-26 Thread mckinlay at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-09-26 22:36 --- AC_PROG_CXX is, presumably, needed by classpath in order to build the Qt peers. Although this is not the default configuration, it means we can't remove AC_PROG_CXX. The libjava configure gets around this issue

[Bug libgcj/24051] [4.1 Regression]: libjava failed to configure

2005-09-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-25 21:10 --- Assigning to Tromey via his request. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug libgcj/24051] [4.1 Regression]: libjava failed to configure

2005-09-24 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-09-24 23:47 --- Shouldn't it be re-reverted? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24051

[Bug libgcj/24051] [4.1 Regression]: libjava failed to configure

2005-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-24 23:44 --- Commenting out AC_PROG_CXX should work. It was something which was reverted in the import. -- What|Removed |Added --