https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21524
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21524
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 20:09 ---
I looked at this a little today.
The code does look wrong, but I couldn't write a simple test case
to make it fail. Do you have one?
One problem I see is that serve() uses the task's 'scheduled' field
without checki
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-13
16:30 ---
Could you write a reduced test case?
Ideally it would be in Mauve form; that way we can easily put it
in the test suite when we put in the fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21524
--- Additional Comments From jradel at 2wire dot com 2005-05-12 18:32
---
(From update of attachment 8868)
Ignore this first proposed fix... it's buggy. Working on a new version.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|java|libgcj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21524
