[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4e748747a6536dc49586c8202284bc2b7bf2c6c commit r8-10108-gf4e748747a6536dc49586c8202284bc2b7bf2c6c Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon F

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > Fixed for GCC 10, GCC 9.3 and GCC 8.4. The fix is in GCC 8.5, not GCC 8.4.

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3fde3398341ba900ed2e1eaecf00799fda66686a commit r9-8208-g3fde3398341ba900ed2e1eaecf00799fda66686a Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon Fe

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf6465d0461234ccd45ae34d5e2375a0bee0081d commit r10-6550-gbf6465d0461234ccd45ae34d5e2375a0bee0081d Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon Feb 10 07

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 --- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Oct 3 16:55:06 2018 New Revision: 264814 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264814&root=gcc&view=rev Log: i386: Remove _Unwind_Frames_Increment CET kernel has been changed

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 --- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Jul 27 14:40:47 2018 New Revision: 263030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263030&root=gcc&view=rev Log: i386: Remove _Unwind_Frames_Increment CET kernel has been changed

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Apr 19 17:05:39 2018 New Revision: 259502 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259502&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libgcc/CET: Skip signal frames when unwinding shadow stack When -f

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > My patch doesn't fix g++.dg/eh/sighandle.C compiled with > > -O2 -fcf-protection -mcet It is because (gdb) bt #0 _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=exc@entry=0x416ed0) at /e

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|