https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65902
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65902
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Well, I thought maybe it would not hurt to be more permissive...
At least math.h and stdlib.h include
which contains something like this:
#ifndef __cplusplus
typedef cyg_halbool bool;
# ifndef false
#
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65902
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65902
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #2)
> The standard headers should only be defining bool if stdbool.h has been
> included. So this looks more like a build environment error than a bug in
> GCC.
y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65902
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-eabi
--- Comment #2 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65902
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger ---
this would fix the regression:
--- libgcc/unwind-arm-common.inc.jj 2015-01-05 13:33:28.0 +0100
+++ libgcc/unwind-arm-common.inc2015-04-27 15:54:04.378469179 +0200
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
/*
