https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #17 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Thu Nov 27 14:10:10 2014
New Revision: 218127
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218127&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-27 Thomas Preud'homme
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #16 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Thu Nov 27 13:58:35 2014
New Revision: 218126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218126&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-13 Thomas Preud'homme
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #15 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'll take care of it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #14 from Yvan Roux ---
> No I meant FSF 4.8 branch. The bug log only show a commit to trunk and GCC
> 4.9 FSF branch.
It's only in trunk (the backport I made was in Linaro 4.9 branch). For FSF
branches check with the maintainers an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #13 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Yvan Roux from comment #12)
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > Any chance you could backport for 4.8 Yvan? Do you want me to do it? Or are
> > the release manager against a 4.8 backport?
>
> Do y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #12 from Yvan Roux ---
Hi Thomas,
> Any chance you could backport for 4.8 Yvan? Do you want me to do it? Or are
> the release manager against a 4.8 backport?
Do you mean Linaro 4.8 branch ? if it is the case I'll not be able to do i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #11 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Yvan Roux from comment #9)
> Author: yroux
> Date: Mon Oct 6 12:25:14 2014
> New Revision: 215929
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215929&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> /libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #10 from npl at chello dot at ---
Hi,
thanks for the fix, any chance of adding this to 4.9 and 4.8 aswell?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #9 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Mon Oct 6 12:25:14 2014
New Revision: 215929
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215929&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/libstdc++-v3/
2014-10-06 Yvan Roux
Backport from trunk r215101.
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #8 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Sep 10 04:45:32 2014
New Revision: 215101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215101&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-10 Tony Wang
libstdc++-v3/
PR target/5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #7 from wangzheyu ---
Another test case doesn't involve noexcept key workd.
Cmd line: arm-none-eabi-g++ -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-m3 -O0 -g -std=c++11
-specs=rdimon.specs main.c -o main.exe
#include
#include
_Unwind_Reason_Code trace_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
wangzheyu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tony.wang at arm dot com
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #5 from Joey Ye ---
This issue was predicted back to when _Unwind_Backtrace was enabled on ARM.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-08/msg00235.html
"This will keep going if the personality routine returns _URC_FAILURE.
Do you need anythi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #4 from npl at chello dot at ---
I just found the similar entry on launchpad.
I have to recall this from memory, as its been a long time since I played
around with it.
The issue of repeating entries occurs if you have a function wihou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #2 from npl at chello dot at ---
I cant easily make a simple reproducible testcase as this is a custom realtime
OS for a very specific CPU. And I can only test this example next week at work
where I have hardware to run it.
And I certa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
Joey Ye changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joey.ye at arm dot com
--- Comment #1 from Joey
18 matches
Mail list logo
