https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106949
--- Comment #5 from Anton Fedorov ---
Hhhhmmm... Interesting, it doesn't seems to be possible, but it would be fun
way to fix to add cleanup(free) attribute to the variable if it has to be
malloc'ed...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106949
--- Comment #4 from Anton Fedorov ---
> You can't just add a stack segment without changing the stack pointer.
I can -- since we are on the initial stack at this point, no return into
__morestack will happen so no attempt to release it, thus th
