https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99740
--- Comment #5 from Paul A. Voytas ---
I understand random_number() is much better--which is great and I'll use it
going forward. I was just trying to not have to recode a lot in cases where I
used rand() because it was good enough. I certainly w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99740
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:52:53PM +, pvoytas at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99740
>
> --- Comment #3 from Paul A. Voytas ---
> I see what you mean--if i test for r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99740
--- Comment #3 from Paul A. Voytas ---
I see what you mean--if i test for rand(0)=0.d0 I do get hist with gfortran on
the EL7 machine.
But it seems like there must still be something different from older versions.
The info pages for rand() say
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99740
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99740
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-23
Ever confirmed
