[Bug libfortran/80602] Reduce stack usage for blocked matmul

2017-05-16 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80602 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/80602] Reduce stack usage for blocked matmul

2017-05-16 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80602 --- Comment #7 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6) > I just committed r248074 which I suspect is the same problem > (the fix for PR 80765). > > If you could just upgrade to the most recent trunk (only > need to upgrad

[Bug libfortran/80602] Reduce stack usage for blocked matmul

2017-05-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80602 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- I just committed r248074 which I suspect is the same problem (the fix for PR 80765). If you could just upgrade to the most recent trunk (only need to upgrade libgfortran, really) an check if the fix also wor

[Bug libfortran/80602] Reduce stack usage for blocked matmul

2017-05-15 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80602 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug libfortran/80602] Reduce stack usage for blocked matmul

2017-05-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80602 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- Might want to backport the 8.0 patch to gcc-7, but only after the dust from the regressions this caused has settled.

[Bug libfortran/80602] Reduce stack usage for blocked matmul

2017-05-08 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80602 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon May 8 17:56:13 2017 New Revision: 247753 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247753&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-05-08 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/80602 * m4/matmu

[Bug libfortran/80602] Reduce stack usage for blocked matmul

2017-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80602 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- s/t1_dim = (a_dim1-1) * 256 + b_dim1);/t1_dim = (a_dim1-1) * 256 + b_dim1;/

[Bug libfortran/80602] Reduce stack usage for blocked matmul

2017-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80602 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig --- This is the idea: --- matmul_internal.m4 (revision 247566) +++ matmul_internal.m4 (working copy) @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ sinclude(`matmul_asm_'rtype_code`.m4')dnl i1, i2, i3, i4, i5, i6;

[Bug libfortran/80602] Reduce stack usage for blocked matmul

2017-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80602 Bug 80602 depends on bug 80615, which changed state. Bug 80615 Summary: [8 Regression] Boostrap fails because genmddeps nees not-yet-built libiberty.a https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80615 What|Removed

[Bug libfortran/80602] Reduce stack usage for blocked matmul

2017-05-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80602 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|