https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
Alexey Rychkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Are you sure that problem is not in GREP_OPTIONS='--color=always' which
> according to man results in color output using default color scheme '01;31'?
No! but you can do the test by unsetting GREP_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #9 from Alexey Rychkov ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
> > ... results in valid output.
>
> So Mikael probably got the point: don't buil in the source directory.
> Instead of
>
> > cd gcc-5.2.0
> > mkdir build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> ... results in valid output.
So Mikael probably got the point: don't buil in the source directory. Instead
of
> cd gcc-5.2.0
> mkdir build && cd build
> ../configure --disable-multilib
> make
do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #7 from Alexey Rychkov ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> > I'm not sure if this can affect something, but I was using tmux on top
> > of ssh session...
>
> Can you try again without tmx? I am not that familiar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #6 from Alexey Rychkov ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #4)
> Did you set GREP_OPTIONS?
Yes, GREP_OPTIONS='--color=always'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
Did you set GREP_OPTIONS?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I'm not sure if this can affect something, but I was using tmux on top
> of ssh session...
Can you try again without tmx? I am not that familiar with sequences such as
"^[[01;31m^[[K^[[m^[[K", but I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #2 from Alexey Rychkov ---
#define GFC_REAL_4_HUGE ^[[01;31m^[[K^[[m^[[K 3.40282347e38f
#define GFC_REAL_4_LITERAL_SUFFIX f
#define GFC_REAL_4_LITERAL(X) (X ## f)
#define GFC_REAL_4_DIGITS ^[[01;31m^[[K^[[m^[[K 24
#define GFC_REAL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
11 matches
Mail list logo