[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

2015-08-11 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 --- Comment #13 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- (In reply to kargl from comment #6) > The GFORTRAN_1.6 section of the symbol map where I've inserted > the _gfortan_mvbits_i16 symbol does not exist in 5-branch. If > the other functions in this s

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

2015-08-10 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 --- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Aug 10 21:45:01 2015 New Revision: 226769 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226769&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-08-10 Steven G. Kargl PR libfortran/67140

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

2015-08-10 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

2015-08-10 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 09:40:51PM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > > > > Index: intrinsics/mvbits.c > > === > > --- intrinsics/mvbits

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

2015-08-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

2015-08-10 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 09:24:53PM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 > > --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to kargl from comment #6) > > F

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

2015-08-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to kargl from comment #6) > Fixed on trunk. > > The GFORTRAN_1.6 section of the symbol map where I've inserted > the _gfortan_mvbits_i16 symbol does not exist in 5-branch. If > the other functions in

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

2015-08-10 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

2015-08-10 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Aug 10 17:42:00 2015 New Revision: 226764 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226764&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-08-10 Steven G. Kargl PR libfortran/67140

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

2015-08-08 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:50:03PM +, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 > > Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

2015-08-08 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

2015-08-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36144 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36144&action=edit patch Patched built and tested with OP's code. Regression test passed.