[Bug libfortran/66458] Loading libgfortran.so changes the FPU exception flags

2015-08-08 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug libfortran/66458] Loading libgfortran.so changes the FPU exception flags

2015-08-07 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458 --- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Fri Aug 7 16:23:53 2015 New Revision: 226725 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226725&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libfortran/66458 * runtime/main.c (init):

[Bug libfortran/66458] Loading libgfortran.so changes the FPU exception flags

2015-08-06 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458 --- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- The comment in the front-end confirms the original intent, which is that FPU shouldn't be messed with if the user didn't explicitly request it: /* If -ffpe-trap option was provided, add a call to

[Bug libfortran/66458] Loading libgfortran.so changes the FPU exception flags

2015-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/66458] Loading libgfortran.so changes the FPU exception flags

2015-06-08 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug libfortran/66458] Loading libgfortran.so changes the FPU exception flags

2015-06-08 Thread jan at epgmod dot phys.tue.nl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458 Jan van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Ho

[Bug libfortran/66458] Loading libgfortran.so changes the FPU exception flags

2015-06-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This is done on purpose.