http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
--- Comment #12 from jimis 2012-07-09 09:52:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> bug-libt...@gnu.org
FWIW I had sent this but got no reply:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2011-08/msg3.html
Maybe we should open this or the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED|RESOLVED
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab 2012-07-08 08:26:03
UTC ---
bug-libt...@gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-07-08 08:20:02 UTC ---
I don't know where the libtool bug tracker is, though I presume it has
one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
jimis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #8 from jimis 2012-07-08
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
jimis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #7 from jimis 2012-07-08 03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
--- Comment #5 from jimis 2011-08-03 19:32:09 UTC ---
DESTDIR is supported just fine, but it is not prefix, it serves different
purposes. In particular it installs in /$DESTDIR/$prefix but installed package
would search libraries in /$prefix.
jo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl
2011-08-03 19:09:22 UTC ---
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 07:01:55PM +, jimis at gmx dot net wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
>
> --- Comment #2 from jimis 2011-08-03 19:01:51 UTC ---
> I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-08-03 19:03:24 UTC ---
This is a bug in libtool. See bug 46607. It will need to be fixed in
upstream libtool (see bug 46607 comment 10 for what might be the simplest
approach).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
--- Comment #2 from jimis 2011-08-03 19:01:51 UTC ---
I use it casually for packages that use autotools to configure the build, it
always works fine. And for gcc it has worked for me plenty of times for i386
C-frontend only builds, and till not I'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
12 matches
Mail list logo