http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
--- Comment #6 from Nicolai Stange 2011-05-28
15:48:41 UTC ---
> Can you test whether this works on 4.6?
Works like a charm with gcc-4.6.0 release (without any diffs applied).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
--- Comment #5 from Nicolai Stange 2011-05-20
14:15:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Can you test whether this works on 4.6?
Sure, but this might take some time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
--- Comment #4 from Nicolai Stange 2011-05-20
14:14:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Are you sure you need the
>
> #include
Definitely, i've got compile errors when it isn't there.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-05-20 13:40:47
UTC ---
Actually, in the version control log for acinclude.m4 we have
commit b00fa2cfbfd81cbdc31d5a44e4ce8140cc153776
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Feb 25 17:56:04 2011 +
* ac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
--- Comment #1 from Nicolai Stange 2011-05-13
14:44:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 24240
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24240
Against 4.5.2
The remove and add of the comment line in fpu-sysv.h within this patch is
intentional
