http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
Laurent GUERBY changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
--- Comment #6 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-02-15
22:43:17 UTC ---
For reference a verbose version of the testsuite warnings that cause FAIL. I
will deactivate fortran in my future builds because otherwise the
gcc-testresults@ mail is too big and get
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-15
21:30:45 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Feb 15 21:30:43 2011
New Revision: 170200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170200
Log:
2011-02-15 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
--- Comment #4 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-02-15
14:17:09 UTC ---
Tobias, the patch you mentionned did allow bootstrap with c,fortran and without
disabling libquadmath for gcc version 4.6.0 20110212 (experimental) [trunk
revision 170072] (GCC).
Fee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-14
21:02:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> --disable-libquadmath-support was enough to build.
Could you try whether using the patch in attachment 23341 (from PR 47648)
allows you to build GCC without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
--- Comment #2 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-02-13
21:01:40 UTC ---
--disable-libquadmath-support was enough to build.
However gfortran test results are pretty poor:
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes24669
# o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
