[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 Thomas Henlich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #31 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-01 02:29:43 UTC --- Thomas, can this be closed yet?

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #30 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-01 02:28:04 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Mar 1 02:28:02 2011 New Revision: 170586 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170586 Log: 2011-02-28 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #29 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-01 02:24:52 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Mar 1 02:24:50 2011 New Revision: 170585 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170585 Log: 2011-02-28 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-28 21:19:35 UTC --- New patch which passes Programmatic test case has been submitted for approval.

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 Thomas Henlich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #26 from Thomas Henlich 2011-02-25 13:58:51 UTC --- Created attachment 23467 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23467 Programmatic test case for multiple formats

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-24 05:10:41 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Feb 24 05:10:37 2011 New Revision: 170461 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170461 Log: 2011-02-23 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #23 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-24 04:52:05 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Feb 24 04:52:00 2011 New Revision: 170458 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170458 Log: 2011-02-23 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #22 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-21 14:32:14 UTC --- On my system I get with: print *, "--" print "(F0.0)", -0.0 ! => -0. print "(F3.0)", -0.0 ! => -0. print "(F2.0)", -0.0 ! => ** print "(F1.0)

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-21 14:22:51 UTC --- OK, can you tell I am time slicing this one. ;)

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 Thomas Henlich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-19 15:21:10 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Feb 19 15:21:05 2011 New Revision: 170319 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170319 Log: 2011-02-19 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-19 15:10:58 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Feb 19 15:10:55 2011 New Revision: 170318 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170318 Log: 2011-02-19 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-17 19:30:47 UTC --- Disregard comment #15, typo in PR number

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-17 05:19:54 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Feb 17 05:19:50 2011 New Revision: 170239 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170239 Log: 2011-02-16 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-08 12:36:19 UTC --- OK, thanks for spotting that. I will have a look.

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 Thomas Henlich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Henlich 2011-02-07 07:01:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > Fixed on trunk. I don't think this is significant enough to justify a > back-port. I am not sure why anyone would use f1.X for anything, so this > exerci

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-05 17:58:51 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Feb 5 17:58:48 2011 New Revision: 169853 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169853 Log: 2011-02-05 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-05 13:15:08 UTC --- I completely understand your position on '*' vs '0' At the time we first implemented showing that special case with zero, we had a bit of discussion on it. It was clear that the stand

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich 2011-02-05 07:53:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > In extension, the following should also print the same result: > > print "(F1.0)", 0.0 ! => 0 > print "(F1.0)", 1.0 ! => * > print "(F1.0)", 2.0 ! => *

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Henlich 2011-02-05 07:45:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Regardless of this choice, the following should all print the same result, > which they currently don't. > > print "(F1.0)", 0.0 ! => 0 > print "(F1.0)",

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Henlich 2011-02-05 07:40:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > For this special case: > > print "(F1.0)", 0.0 ! => 0 expected * > > Up to now, we have interpreted the last sentence in F95 10.5.1.2.1 F95 > 10.2.1.

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-05 06:22:03 UTC --- Created attachment 23251 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23251 A proposed patch This patch regression tests OK and gives the results shown in my last comment.

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-05 02:10:39 UTC --- With: print "(F0.0)", 0.001 ! => 0. print "(F0.0)", 0.01 ! => 0. print "(F0.0)", 0.1 ! => 0. print "(F1.0)", -0.0 ! => 0 print "(F1.0)", 0.001 ! => * print "(F1.0)", 0.01 ! => *

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-05 01:32:42 UTC --- For this special case: print "(F1.0)", 0.0 ! => 0 expected * Up to now, we have interpreted the last sentence in F95 10.5.1.2.1 F95 10.2.1.1 to require this to print '0'. "Leadi

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,