--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-15 07:39
---
*** Bug 35563 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-12 15:34 ---
*** Bug 35554 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35524
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-12 10:29
---
Fixed, thanks for your report.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-12 10:25
---
Subject: Bug 35524
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Wed Mar 12 10:24:29 2008
New Revision: 133138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133138
Log:
PR libfortran/35524
* intrinsics/erfc_sc
--- Comment #3 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2008-03-11
19:49 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Can you please try the following patch and tell me whether it helps?
It fixed the problem. Thank you.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35524
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-11 07:52
---
There's one good thing in FreeBSD: it sure helps finding any reference to a C99
long double function that is not protected by a autoconf macro :)
Can you please try the following patch and tell me whether it help
