--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-11 10:50
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-11 10:49
---
Subject: Bug 32812
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Mar 11 10:49:13 2008
New Revision: 133104
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133104
Log:
PR libfortran/32812
* intrinsics/random.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
|
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-12 19:50
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> It might even be better to do bit-wise shuffling to get
> the most out of the millisecond-field in date_and_time.
I thought about that at the beginning, but then it really gets messy :(
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-12 11:19 ---
> So, since it's just shuffling bytes (and it's a bijective operation, of
> course), I don't think I'm messing with any of the properties of the
> generator.
I concur. It might even be better to do bit-wise shuff
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 21:28
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Your attempt to randomize the seeds really isn't all that good because
> there is such a limited amount of entropy in year, month, day, and hour.
I do agree. There's no way I'm adding e
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 20:47 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > UGH.
> >
> > I'd rather document gfortran's behavior than add additional hacks
> > into the compiler.
>
> Hum, I was of the same opinion at first. What somehow
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 19:23
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> UGH.
>
> I'd rather document gfortran's behavior than add additional hacks
> into the compiler.
Hum, I was of the same opinion at first. What somehow convinced me that it
might be wort
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 19:10 ---
UGH.
I'd rather document gfortran's behavior than add additional hacks
into the compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32812
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 19:04
---
I guess we have to scramble the seed given by the user, something like this:
Index: intrinsics/random.c
===
--- intrinsics/random.c (revision 127331
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 13:07
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
This Usenet post can be found at:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/0b60cf25162534bf/2e8d2775f455a33f
--
fxcoudert at gcc do
11 matches
Mail list logo
