[Bug libfortran/32336] matmul: flag runtime- instead of assertation error

2007-07-09 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-09 22:35 --- Fixed on trunk. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/32336] matmul: flag runtime- instead of assertation error

2007-07-09 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-09 22:35 --- Subject: Bug 32336 Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Jul 9 22:34:43 2007 New Revision: 126498 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126498 Log: 2007-07-09 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR li

[Bug libfortran/32336] matmul: flag runtime- instead of assertation error

2007-07-08 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-08 22:08 --- Here's an example: $ cat mm.f90 program main real, dimension(:,:), allocatable :: a real, dimension(:), allocatable :: b allocate (a(2,2), b(3)) call random_number(a) call random_number(b) print *,matmul

[Bug libfortran/32336] matmul: flag runtime- instead of assertation error

2007-06-15 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-15 19:09 --- Unfortunately, I "lost" the example code and wasn't able to recreate one. I will attach an example when I come across another one. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32336

[Bug libfortran/32336] matmul: flag runtime- instead of assertation error

2007-06-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-15 18:51 --- Confirmed, a runtime error would be better. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -