--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-04 20:29 ---
Fixed in trunk. Closing.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-04 20:24 ---
Subject: Bug 31760
Author: dfranke
Date: Fri May 4 19:24:43 2007
New Revision: 124446
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124446
Log:
gcc/fortran:
2007-05-04 Daniel Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-29 22:21 ---
These functions are correctly marked as ELEMENTAL, but the assigned check
functions make sure that only scalars are passed. The patch is simple and
currently regtesting.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-29 18:12 ---
This falls into the enhancement request category, and I agree that
these functions should be elemental. I'll also note that the gfortran
documentation claims that these functions are already elemental.
--
kargl at
--
highegg at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31760
--- Comment #2 from highegg at gmail dot com 2007-04-29 18:03 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Why is this a bug in your opinion? ERF and the Bessel functions are MIL/GNU
> extensions. I don't think there's a standard that requires these functions to
> be elemental. Do you think this is
--- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-29 17:50 ---
Why is this a bug in your opinion? ERF and the Bessel functions are MIL/GNU
extensions. I don't think there's a standard that requires these functions to
be elemental. Do you think this is a bug because the functio
