--- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 19:18
---
Fixed on 4.1 as well.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 19:17 ---
Subject: Bug 28452
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Aug 26 19:17:35 2006
New Revision: 116476
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116476
Log:
2006-08-26 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR li
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-01 17:30 ---
Subject: Bug 28452
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Aug 1 17:29:50 2006
New Revision: 115859
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115859
Log:
2006-08-01 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR li
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 19:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=11951)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11951&action=view)
Current status of patch
Here's the current patch. It regtests fine, and
seems to do the Right Thing.
I haven'
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 20:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=11929)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11929&action=view)
current status of patch
This is the current status of the patch. As I wrote,
this isn't yet complete.
Thomas
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 20:12 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Don't you need a HAVE_GFC_REAL_16 section or is random_r10 used
> for random_r16?
Oops, I uploaded the wrong patch. Sorry 'bout that.
However, I still need to think a bit about what con
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-23 23:32 ---
Thomas,
Don't you need a HAVE_GFC_REAL_16 section or is random_r10 used
for random_r16?
Also, I noticed that you've eliminated the normalize_* calls.
I think may actually be able to remove these functions and
the fil
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-23 21:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=11926)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11926&action=view)
patch
This implements random for KIND=10 and KIND=16 REALs. It
is regression-tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu, but
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-23 17:23 ---
While I work on this, I might as well tackle some other issues.
Before I start work, some timings with a vanilla tree as of today.
The timing isn't terrible (within a factor of two with Intel 8.1),
but of course, I
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-23 17:14 ---
I'll take a look at this.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-07/msg00311.html and
follow-ups for the discussion of this bug.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
|
11 matches
Mail list logo
