--- Comment #6 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 21:13 ---
Above commit remove dot_product from libgfortran, and this this PR should be
fixed.
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 16:52 ---
Subject: Bug 27919
Author: jb
Date: Wed Jul 19 16:52:45 2006
New Revision: 115594
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115594
Log:
2006-07-19 Janne Blomqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/27
--- Comment #4 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 16:52 ---
Subject: Bug 27919
Author: jb
Date: Wed Jul 19 16:51:49 2006
New Revision: 115593
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115593
Log:
2006-07-19 Janne Blomqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/27
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-07-19 15:55 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 27919
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg00817.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #2 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-08 04:52 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> At the same time the so version needs to change, as this is an ABI change in
> the library.
>
Yes. However, I think a single so version increase is enough for 4.1->4.2, and
I plan to increase
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-07 09:58 ---
At the same time the so version needs to change, as this is an ABI change in
the library.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27919
